<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 868 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778379</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the appeals and upheld the HC orders directing payment of interest at 15% on the excess security deposited for issuance of form-31, from date of deposit to date of refund. The SC found no reason to interfere with the HC&#039;s determination, even though the statute contained no provision expressly prescribing interest on the excess amount, and affirmed the impugned HC orders dated 10-08-2010 and 13-01-2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:02:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 868 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778379</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the appeals and upheld the HC orders directing payment of interest at 15% on the excess security deposited for issuance of form-31, from date of deposit to date of refund. The SC found no reason to interfere with the HC&#039;s determination, even though the statute contained no provision expressly prescribing interest on the excess amount, and affirmed the impugned HC orders dated 10-08-2010 and 13-01-2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>