<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 884 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778395</link>
    <description>ITAT (Mumbai) deleted an addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) where the difference between stamp-duty valuation by the valuation officer and the declared consideration did not exceed 10%. Relying on the post-2018 amendment to s.50C enlarging the tolerance band from 5% to 10%, the Tribunal treated the increased tolerance as curative and held that no income-tax addition was warranted. Decision favorable to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:02:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 884 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778395</link>
      <description>ITAT (Mumbai) deleted an addition under s.56(2)(vii)(b) where the difference between stamp-duty valuation by the valuation officer and the declared consideration did not exceed 10%. Relying on the post-2018 amendment to s.50C enlarging the tolerance band from 5% to 10%, the Tribunal treated the increased tolerance as curative and held that no income-tax addition was warranted. Decision favorable to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>