<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 894 - ITAT VISAKHAPATAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778405</link>
    <description>ITAT held that a notice issued under s.148 beyond three years required prior approval from authorities specified in s.151(ii); the AO obtained approval from a Pr. Commissioner who lacked jurisdiction under the post-1.4.2021 statute. Consequently the assessment framed under ss.147 r/w 144 r/w 144B was without valid jurisdiction and was quashed. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:02:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 894 - ITAT VISAKHAPATAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778405</link>
      <description>ITAT held that a notice issued under s.148 beyond three years required prior approval from authorities specified in s.151(ii); the AO obtained approval from a Pr. Commissioner who lacked jurisdiction under the post-1.4.2021 statute. Consequently the assessment framed under ss.147 r/w 144 r/w 144B was without valid jurisdiction and was quashed. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>