https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46548 Rule 16 of the anti-dumping regime requires the Designated Authority to disclose the essential facts under consideration before final findings, but it does not require a show-cause notice or a prior hearing in the manner of quasi-judicial adjudication. Rule 17 makes the investigation and final determination time-bound, reflecting the public and statutory character of the process. In that framework, a party has no legal right to insist on postponement of the comment period merely because the notice period is short, where the schedule must be completed within the prescribed timeline. No violation of natural justice was found, and no entitlement to extension of time arose. en-us Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:43:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46548 Rule 16 of the anti-dumping regime requires the Designated Authority to disclose the essential facts under consideration before final findings, but it does not require a show-cause notice or a prior hearing in the manner of quasi-judicial adjudication. Rule 17 makes the investigation and final determination time-bound, reflecting the public and statutory character of the process. In that framework, a party has no legal right to insist on postponement of the comment period merely because the notice period is short, where the schedule must be completed within the prescribed timeline. No violation of natural justice was found, and no entitlement to extension of time arose. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46548