<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46547</link>
    <description>Imported Indigo pure used in denim manufacture was treated as raw material because an ingredient essential to the manufacturing process and consumed in bringing the end product into existence falls within that ordinary commercial meaning. On that basis, even a small quantity of imported dye could not be ignored, since the finished fabric could not emerge without it. The presence of the imported ingredient meant the goods were not manufactured wholly from raw materials produced or manufactured in India, so the exemption benefit was unavailable and the Tribunal&#039;s order was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:41:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46547</link>
      <description>Imported Indigo pure used in denim manufacture was treated as raw material because an ingredient essential to the manufacturing process and consumed in bringing the end product into existence falls within that ordinary commercial meaning. On that basis, even a small quantity of imported dye could not be ignored, since the finished fabric could not emerge without it. The presence of the imported ingredient meant the goods were not manufactured wholly from raw materials produced or manufactured in India, so the exemption benefit was unavailable and the Tribunal&#039;s order was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>