<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1193 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463752</link>
    <description>Where a dealer deposited excess security for issuance of Form-31 and that excess amount was admitted to be refundable, interest was payable on the wrongfully retained sum from the date of deposit until refund. The Court applied the principle that retention of money without justification attracts interest and upheld interest at 15% on the excess deposit. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to award interest was sustained on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:40:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1193 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463752</link>
      <description>Where a dealer deposited excess security for issuance of Form-31 and that excess amount was admitted to be refundable, interest was payable on the wrongfully retained sum from the date of deposit until refund. The Court applied the principle that retention of money without justification attracts interest and upheld interest at 15% on the excess deposit. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to award interest was sustained on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>