<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46537</link>
    <description>A quasi-judicial appellate authority cannot pass a second contradictory order against the same original order once an earlier appellate order is already in force; a later appellate determination without lawful review or reconsideration is inoperative and a nullity. Where a subsequent tribunal order rests on such an invalid appellate order, it cannot stand without fresh adjudication after hearing the affected party. The text also notes that natural justice requires a proper merits hearing on the legality of the first appellate order before any confirming order is sustained. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh decision on merits, with no final view expressed on the classification dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:19:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 108 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46537</link>
      <description>A quasi-judicial appellate authority cannot pass a second contradictory order against the same original order once an earlier appellate order is already in force; a later appellate determination without lawful review or reconsideration is inoperative and a nullity. Where a subsequent tribunal order rests on such an invalid appellate order, it cannot stand without fresh adjudication after hearing the affected party. The text also notes that natural justice requires a proper merits hearing on the legality of the first appellate order before any confirming order is sustained. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh decision on merits, with no final view expressed on the classification dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>