<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1639 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463747</link>
    <description>Deduction under Section 80IA must be factored into the computation of profits and gains from export business, and the aggregate deduction cannot exceed the business profits. The legal position was treated as no longer res integra, and the tribunal&#039;s view was found consistent with that position. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to claim deductions under both Section 80IA and Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1639 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463747</link>
      <description>Deduction under Section 80IA must be factored into the computation of profits and gains from export business, and the aggregate deduction cannot exceed the business profits. The legal position was treated as no longer res integra, and the tribunal&#039;s view was found consistent with that position. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to claim deductions under both Section 80IA and Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>