https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463746 HC allowed the writ petition and held that respondent coal company's unilateral levy of an extra 20% over the notified coal price for January 2007-March 2008, applied only to linked consumers, was arbitrary and violative of Article 14. The court found no statutory or governmental authorization for the charge and viewed it as an improper attempt to recoup refunds ordered by the Apex Court. Respondent was directed to refund or adjust the 20% within eight weeks, failing which the petitioner is entitled to 6% p.a. interest from the date of charge until payment. en-us Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:13:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463746 HC allowed the writ petition and held that respondent coal company's unilateral levy of an extra 20% over the notified coal price for January 2007-March 2008, applied only to linked consumers, was arbitrary and violative of Article 14. The court found no statutory or governmental authorization for the charge and viewed it as an improper attempt to recoup refunds ordered by the Apex Court. Respondent was directed to refund or adjust the 20% within eight weeks, failing which the petitioner is entitled to 6% p.a. interest from the date of charge until payment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463746