<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 122 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46532</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the order of attachment under the Customs Act, directing the department to initiate fresh proceedings with show cause notices and personal hearings. The Court found evidence of fraud and collusion in acquiring properties with fraudulently obtained funds, ruling the proceedings were not barred by res judicata. The judgment emphasized due process and adherence to the law, continuing the attachment during adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 13:12:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 122 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46532</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the order of attachment under the Customs Act, directing the department to initiate fresh proceedings with show cause notices and personal hearings. The Court found evidence of fraud and collusion in acquiring properties with fraudulently obtained funds, ruling the proceedings were not barred by res judicata. The judgment emphasized due process and adherence to the law, continuing the attachment during adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>