<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal allowed: Additions under sections 68/69 deleted where audited books and s.145(3) report supported sales and purchases</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92528</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted all additions made by the AO under sections 68/69 of the Act. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s tax-sample study and average cash-realisation approach were insufficient to treat deposits and sundry-debtor receipts as unexplained, particularly where audited books and the audit report-neither rejected nor doubted under section 145(3)-reflected corresponding sales and purchases. The AO&#039;s failure to make requisite enquiries into purchases, sales or stock undermined the additions. The ITAT agreed that non-response by nine debtors could only justify further investigation, not immediate disallowance, and consequently set aside the entire addition, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal allowed: Additions under sections 68/69 deleted where audited books and s.145(3) report supported sales and purchases</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92528</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted all additions made by the AO under sections 68/69 of the Act. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s tax-sample study and average cash-realisation approach were insufficient to treat deposits and sundry-debtor receipts as unexplained, particularly where audited books and the audit report-neither rejected nor doubted under section 145(3)-reflected corresponding sales and purchases. The AO&#039;s failure to make requisite enquiries into purchases, sales or stock undermined the additions. The ITAT agreed that non-response by nine debtors could only justify further investigation, not immediate disallowance, and consequently set aside the entire addition, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>