<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 820 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778331</link>
    <description>Transaction value remained the starting point for customs assessment, and it could be displaced only on proper inquiry and reliable evidence of undervaluation. Here, the goods had already been examined and the value enhanced at clearance, while the later demand rested mainly on a statement without corroboration of extra consideration, parallel invoices, mutuality of interest, or any proven flowback to overseas suppliers. As undervaluation was not established and no cogent basis was shown to disturb the original assessment, the redetermination of assessable value, the demand of differential duty with interest, and the penalties were unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 820 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778331</link>
      <description>Transaction value remained the starting point for customs assessment, and it could be displaced only on proper inquiry and reliable evidence of undervaluation. Here, the goods had already been examined and the value enhanced at clearance, while the later demand rested mainly on a statement without corroboration of extra consideration, parallel invoices, mutuality of interest, or any proven flowback to overseas suppliers. As undervaluation was not established and no cogent basis was shown to disturb the original assessment, the redetermination of assessable value, the demand of differential duty with interest, and the penalties were unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>