<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 827 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778338</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the denial of exemption under s.54F and directing one final opportunity for the assessee to produce documentary evidence. The tribunal found non-production was due to circumstances beyond the assessee&#039;s control and noted no advantage would be gained by withholding documents; it ordered the matter be decided on merits upon submission of the outstanding evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 08:26:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 827 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778338</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the denial of exemption under s.54F and directing one final opportunity for the assessee to produce documentary evidence. The tribunal found non-production was due to circumstances beyond the assessee&#039;s control and noted no advantage would be gained by withholding documents; it ordered the matter be decided on merits upon submission of the outstanding evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>