https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463735 Preventive detention orders were upheld against the challenge based on non-supply of Hindi documents, as the records showed that English and Hindi compilations had been supplied and no denial of effective representation was proved. However, the orders were invalid because vital material was withheld from the detaining authority, including the detainee's complaint and FIR against police officials, which could have affected subjective satisfaction. The failure to place these relevant facts before the authority vitiated the detention. The Court also noted the lapse of time and the dismissal of the later bail application, reinforcing that the detention could not be sustained. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:26:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463735 Preventive detention orders were upheld against the challenge based on non-supply of Hindi documents, as the records showed that English and Hindi compilations had been supplied and no denial of effective representation was proved. However, the orders were invalid because vital material was withheld from the detaining authority, including the detainee's complaint and FIR against police officials, which could have affected subjective satisfaction. The failure to place these relevant facts before the authority vitiated the detention. The Court also noted the lapse of time and the dismissal of the later bail application, reinforcing that the detention could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463735