<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 2187 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463739</link>
    <description>CESTAT KOLKATA - AT held the show-cause notice was issued without proper quantification across service heads and was thus defective; the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s detailed bifurcation and conclusions were upheld. Given the proceedings relate to 2004-05 and 2005-06, the tribunal declined to remit the matter for rehearing after two decades. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 18:02:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 2187 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463739</link>
      <description>CESTAT KOLKATA - AT held the show-cause notice was issued without proper quantification across service heads and was thus defective; the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s detailed bifurcation and conclusions were upheld. Given the proceedings relate to 2004-05 and 2005-06, the tribunal declined to remit the matter for rehearing after two decades. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>