<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46516</link>
    <description>Customs misdeclaration allegations require the Revenue to establish, through clear and cogent evidence, that imported goods differ from their declared description. Multiple official and government laboratory reports, including a contemporaneous test conducted before the Commissioner with departmental representatives present, supported classification as regenerated second-grade methyl methacrylate monomer. A principally relied-on laboratory report was inconclusive and contradicted the laboratory&#039;s earlier inability to determine the status of similar goods. Credible expert test material could not be displaced on non-germane grounds. The misdeclaration finding was therefore unsustainable, and the importer succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46516</link>
      <description>Customs misdeclaration allegations require the Revenue to establish, through clear and cogent evidence, that imported goods differ from their declared description. Multiple official and government laboratory reports, including a contemporaneous test conducted before the Commissioner with departmental representatives present, supported classification as regenerated second-grade methyl methacrylate monomer. A principally relied-on laboratory report was inconclusive and contradicted the laboratory&#039;s earlier inability to determine the status of similar goods. Credible expert test material could not be displaced on non-germane grounds. The misdeclaration finding was therefore unsustainable, and the importer succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>