https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463724 SC held the e-auction scheme invalid and affirmed that petitioners with pending writs challenging the same scheme are entitled to relief flowing from that declaration. Non-parties to earlier proceedings who independently challenged the scheme in pending petitions can claim the benefit of the decision. A defence of unjust enrichment raised for the first time on appeal was disallowed. The Court upheld HC directions for verification of payments, repayment of excess amounts within two months and imposed 9% p.a. interest for delayed compliance. The appellate challenge to the HC's remedial orders was dismissed. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463724 SC held the e-auction scheme invalid and affirmed that petitioners with pending writs challenging the same scheme are entitled to relief flowing from that declaration. Non-parties to earlier proceedings who independently challenged the scheme in pending petitions can claim the benefit of the decision. A defence of unjust enrichment raised for the first time on appeal was disallowed. The Court upheld HC directions for verification of payments, repayment of excess amounts within two months and imposed 9% p.a. interest for delayed compliance. The appellate challenge to the HC's remedial orders was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463724