<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46507</link>
    <description>The Union of India appealed against the Gauhati High Court&#039;s order quashing the Collector&#039;s decision due to the denial of the opportunity to cross-examine specific individuals. The High Court found this denial breached Principles of Natural Justice and directed the Collector to allow cross-examination before deciding the matter afresh. The Collector&#039;s ruling was challenged for violating Principles of Natural Justice, leading to its setting aside and a directive for a fresh examination with cross-examination opportunities. The reliance on statements without cross-examination was deemed unfair, resulting in the Collector&#039;s order being set aside. An appeal against the interim order was disposed of without costs after the main matter was resolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46507</link>
      <description>The Union of India appealed against the Gauhati High Court&#039;s order quashing the Collector&#039;s decision due to the denial of the opportunity to cross-examine specific individuals. The High Court found this denial breached Principles of Natural Justice and directed the Collector to allow cross-examination before deciding the matter afresh. The Collector&#039;s ruling was challenged for violating Principles of Natural Justice, leading to its setting aside and a directive for a fresh examination with cross-examination opportunities. The reliance on statements without cross-examination was deemed unfair, resulting in the Collector&#039;s order being set aside. An appeal against the interim order was disposed of without costs after the main matter was resolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>