<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeals dismissed as non-maintainable; disputes over commissions for overseas remittances must proceed under Section 35L remedy</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92469</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeals as not maintainable, holding that disputes concerning taxability of amounts remitted to overseas entities and characterized as &quot;commission&quot; in export shipping documents must be pursued under the statutory remedy in Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court noted precedent from a co-ordinate bench of the HC construing Sections 35G and 35L to confine appellate jurisdiction in service-tax-type taxability issues to the Supreme Court, and therefore declined to entertain the present appeals. The Appellant is directed to pursue available remedies in accordance with law under Section 35L; the Respondents&#039; position on taxability was not adjudicated on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeals dismissed as non-maintainable; disputes over commissions for overseas remittances must proceed under Section 35L remedy</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92469</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeals as not maintainable, holding that disputes concerning taxability of amounts remitted to overseas entities and characterized as &quot;commission&quot; in export shipping documents must be pursued under the statutory remedy in Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court noted precedent from a co-ordinate bench of the HC construing Sections 35G and 35L to confine appellate jurisdiction in service-tax-type taxability issues to the Supreme Court, and therefore declined to entertain the present appeals. The Appellant is directed to pursue available remedies in accordance with law under Section 35L; the Respondents&#039; position on taxability was not adjudicated on merits.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>