https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778260 CESTAT, Allahabad dismissed the appeals as time-barred. The bench held that appeals must be filed within two months of receipt of the order-in-original, with the Commissioner (Appeals) only empowered to condone an additional one-month delay on sufficient cause. The appeals were filed well beyond the statutory period, and prior decisions rejecting similar contentions about improper service did not assist the appellants. Finding no merit, the tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)'s conclusion that the appeals were barred by limitation and therefore dismissed. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Sep 2025 10:41:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778260 CESTAT, Allahabad dismissed the appeals as time-barred. The bench held that appeals must be filed within two months of receipt of the order-in-original, with the Commissioner (Appeals) only empowered to condone an additional one-month delay on sufficient cause. The appeals were filed well beyond the statutory period, and prior decisions rejecting similar contentions about improper service did not assist the appellants. Finding no merit, the tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)'s conclusion that the appeals were barred by limitation and therefore dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778260