<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 750 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778261</link>
    <description>CESTAT held the departmental presumption of service unsustainable for want of proof of delivery under Section 37C(1)(a); absent proof, the Order-in-Original could not be deemed served and the appeal was not time-barred. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s alleged service date of 01.02.2023, condoned the delay before the First Appellate Authority, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for adjudication on merits without reopening the limitation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 750 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778261</link>
      <description>CESTAT held the departmental presumption of service unsustainable for want of proof of delivery under Section 37C(1)(a); absent proof, the Order-in-Original could not be deemed served and the appeal was not time-barred. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s alleged service date of 01.02.2023, condoned the delay before the First Appellate Authority, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for adjudication on merits without reopening the limitation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>