https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778269 A claimant need only show a bona fide claim and legitimate interest in attached property to invoke the proviso to Section 8(2) of the PMLA; proof of perfect or undisputed title is not a precondition for notice and hearing. Here, the appellant traced title through successive conveyances, asserted possession and cultivation, and was not shown to be a mere stranger or mala fide purchaser, so the material was sufficient to attract the statutory right of participation. The refusal to implead or hear the appellant was therefore unsustainable. en-us Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778269 A claimant need only show a bona fide claim and legitimate interest in attached property to invoke the proviso to Section 8(2) of the PMLA; proof of perfect or undisputed title is not a precondition for notice and hearing. Here, the appellant traced title through successive conveyances, asserted possession and cultivation, and was not shown to be a mere stranger or mala fide purchaser, so the material was sufficient to attract the statutory right of participation. The refusal to implead or hear the appellant was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778269