<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 766 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778277</link>
    <description>CESTAT allows the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that depreciation on capital goods cleared from a 100% EOU cannot be extended only until the date of payment of duty; the Commissioner (Appeals) order permitting depreciation until payment is set aside. The matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority for recalculation of duty in accordance with rules permitting depreciation up to the date the undertaking ceases to be an EOU (debonding), with consequential adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 766 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778277</link>
      <description>CESTAT allows the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that depreciation on capital goods cleared from a 100% EOU cannot be extended only until the date of payment of duty; the Commissioner (Appeals) order permitting depreciation until payment is set aside. The matter is remanded to the adjudicating authority for recalculation of duty in accordance with rules permitting depreciation up to the date the undertaking ceases to be an EOU (debonding), with consequential adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>