<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 778 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778289</link>
    <description>ITAT held penalty under s.271D was not leviable. The tribunal found a reasonable cause existed: as a society the receipt of funds from members fell within the principle of mutuality and the assessee reasonably believed s.269SS did not apply. Further, once the amount was assessed as income it lost character as a loan/deposit, negating penalty under s.271D. Consequently the CIT(A)&#039;s rejection was overturned and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 778 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778289</link>
      <description>ITAT held penalty under s.271D was not leviable. The tribunal found a reasonable cause existed: as a society the receipt of funds from members fell within the principle of mutuality and the assessee reasonably believed s.269SS did not apply. Further, once the amount was assessed as income it lost character as a loan/deposit, negating penalty under s.271D. Consequently the CIT(A)&#039;s rejection was overturned and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>