<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 790 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778301</link>
    <description>ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s orders largely in favour of the assessee, directing the AO to allow pro rata TDS credit only to the extent income was recognized in the year and deleting numerous additions (discounts, reverse charge service tax, bad debts, toner/cartridge, provisions, cost of goods sold items, obsolescence, warranty expenses, depreciation issues and vendor rebate reversal). Several disallowances were held unsupported or already addressed in earlier years; AO was directed to verify certain year-end accrual entries and to delete confirmed improper disallowances. Overall the ITAT sustained the CIT(A)&#039;s reliefs and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:47:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 790 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778301</link>
      <description>ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s orders largely in favour of the assessee, directing the AO to allow pro rata TDS credit only to the extent income was recognized in the year and deleting numerous additions (discounts, reverse charge service tax, bad debts, toner/cartridge, provisions, cost of goods sold items, obsolescence, warranty expenses, depreciation issues and vendor rebate reversal). Several disallowances were held unsupported or already addressed in earlier years; AO was directed to verify certain year-end accrual entries and to delete confirmed improper disallowances. Overall the ITAT sustained the CIT(A)&#039;s reliefs and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>