<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1484 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463702</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal and upheld the HC&#039;s determination that the transit fee levied under the M.P. Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 2000 constitutes part of the &quot;sale price&quot; within section 2(u) of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994. The transit fee was properly included in the taxable turnover by the assessing officer, and the High Court&#039;s conclusions on law and fact were affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:00:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1484 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463702</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal and upheld the HC&#039;s determination that the transit fee levied under the M.P. Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 2000 constitutes part of the &quot;sale price&quot; within section 2(u) of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994. The transit fee was properly included in the taxable turnover by the assessing officer, and the High Court&#039;s conclusions on law and fact were affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>