<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1610 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463706</link>
    <description>Maintainability of the appeal was rejected because the amount involved was below the monetary limit prescribed under CBIC litigation policy instructions dated 22.08.2019. The appeal was therefore dismissed without examination of the merits, applying the departmental policy on low-tax-effect litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:00:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1610 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463706</link>
      <description>Maintainability of the appeal was rejected because the amount involved was below the monetary limit prescribed under CBIC litigation policy instructions dated 22.08.2019. The appeal was therefore dismissed without examination of the merits, applying the departmental policy on low-tax-effect litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>