<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 120 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46489</link>
    <description>The contempt application, based on the non-renewal of a Bank guarantee and violation of court orders, was disposed of by the Supreme Court without penalties. The contemners&#039; unconditional apology was accepted, and costs of Rs. 10,200 were ordered to be paid by the petitioners. The judge noted discrepancies in the court order and actions taken but considered the dispute resolved due to goods delivery and full payment. The contempt matter was closed without further consequences, permanently dispensing with the personal presence of the contemners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:45:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 120 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46489</link>
      <description>The contempt application, based on the non-renewal of a Bank guarantee and violation of court orders, was disposed of by the Supreme Court without penalties. The contemners&#039; unconditional apology was accepted, and costs of Rs. 10,200 were ordered to be paid by the petitioners. The judge noted discrepancies in the court order and actions taken but considered the dispute resolved due to goods delivery and full payment. The contempt matter was closed without further consequences, permanently dispensing with the personal presence of the contemners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>