<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46483</link>
    <description>Crushing boulders into gitti does not amount to manufacture under section 2(17) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, because manufacture requires the emergence of a new commercial commodity and not merely a change in size or form. The Court held that the process of converting stone into chips, gitti or ballast remains processing of the same goods, so the activity falls outside the statutory definition of manufacture and the answer is in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 112 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46483</link>
      <description>Crushing boulders into gitti does not amount to manufacture under section 2(17) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, because manufacture requires the emergence of a new commercial commodity and not merely a change in size or form. The Court held that the process of converting stone into chips, gitti or ballast remains processing of the same goods, so the activity falls outside the statutory definition of manufacture and the answer is in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>