<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 743 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778254</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and set aside the denial of approval under s.80G(5)(iii). The Tribunal held that the relevant authority must satisfy itself about genuineness of activities and fulfillment of conditions before refusing approval, but CIT(Exemptions) failed to produce material showing the trust&#039;s activities were not genuine or conditions unmet. Consequently, the rejection was not sustained and approval was directed to be considered in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:46:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 743 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778254</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and set aside the denial of approval under s.80G(5)(iii). The Tribunal held that the relevant authority must satisfy itself about genuineness of activities and fulfillment of conditions before refusing approval, but CIT(Exemptions) failed to produce material showing the trust&#039;s activities were not genuine or conditions unmet. Consequently, the rejection was not sustained and approval was directed to be considered in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>