<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 742 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778253</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad held that long-term capital gains had to be recomputed on the basis of the unregistered purchase and sale agreements, because banking-channel payments and surrounding circumstances showed the real commercial arrangement and the substance over form principle required the actual consideration to prevail over the registered conveyance deeds. On that basis, the assessee succeeded on the capital gains issue. The Tribunal also deleted the addition as unexplained cash credit, since once the sale consideration was accepted on the basis of the actual agreement and banking evidence, the separate addition could not survive as an independent item. The assessment was therefore to be modified by adopting the agreement values and deleting the disputed addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 742 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778253</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad held that long-term capital gains had to be recomputed on the basis of the unregistered purchase and sale agreements, because banking-channel payments and surrounding circumstances showed the real commercial arrangement and the substance over form principle required the actual consideration to prevail over the registered conveyance deeds. On that basis, the assessee succeeded on the capital gains issue. The Tribunal also deleted the addition as unexplained cash credit, since once the sale consideration was accepted on the basis of the actual agreement and banking evidence, the separate addition could not survive as an independent item. The assessment was therefore to be modified by adopting the agreement values and deleting the disputed addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>