<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46479</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether &quot;lip salve&quot; was classifiable as a medicament under Heading 30.03 or as a skin-care preparation under Heading 33.04 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Applying the functional-use test and Chapter 33 Notes, the SC held the product was essentially protective/preventive for chapping and general lip care, with at most incidental curative effect, and was neither doctor-prescribed nor marketed through pharmaceutical channels. Preparations with merely subsidiary curative or prophylactic value fall within Headings 33.03-33.07, and this product squarely fit Heading 33.04 as a barrier/protective cream for skin other than medicaments. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=85000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 103 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46479</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether &quot;lip salve&quot; was classifiable as a medicament under Heading 30.03 or as a skin-care preparation under Heading 33.04 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Applying the functional-use test and Chapter 33 Notes, the SC held the product was essentially protective/preventive for chapping and general lip care, with at most incidental curative effect, and was neither doctor-prescribed nor marketed through pharmaceutical channels. Preparations with merely subsidiary curative or prophylactic value fall within Headings 33.03-33.07, and this product squarely fit Heading 33.04 as a barrier/protective cream for skin other than medicaments. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>