<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal dismissed as non-maintainable under CBIC litigation policy where tax effect falls below monetary adjudication threshold</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92435</link>
    <description>The CESTAT, by majority, dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for want of maintainability under the CBIC litigation policy, finding the tax effect below the monetary threshold for adjudication before the Tribunal. The Judicial Member&#039;s view-upholding dismissal on the policy ground-prevailed over the Technical Member&#039;s call for a reference to a Larger Bench in light of a contrary Benches&#039; decision. The Tribunal held that consistent decisions of the Supreme Court, High Courts and several Benches on the same issue obviate a Larger Bench reference. The matter is to be placed before the Regular Division Bench for recording the majority view and the appeal is dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal dismissed as non-maintainable under CBIC litigation policy where tax effect falls below monetary adjudication threshold</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92435</link>
      <description>The CESTAT, by majority, dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for want of maintainability under the CBIC litigation policy, finding the tax effect below the monetary threshold for adjudication before the Tribunal. The Judicial Member&#039;s view-upholding dismissal on the policy ground-prevailed over the Technical Member&#039;s call for a reference to a Larger Bench in light of a contrary Benches&#039; decision. The Tribunal held that consistent decisions of the Supreme Court, High Courts and several Benches on the same issue obviate a Larger Bench reference. The matter is to be placed before the Regular Division Bench for recording the majority view and the appeal is dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>