<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 110 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46477</link>
    <description>Domestic tariff area sales under a 100% export oriented unit scheme were treated as part of the composite licence under the Export and Import Policy and the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, not as a separable privilege. Because that facet formed part of the statutory licence, suspension could be made only in compliance with the prescribed procedure under Section 9(4) and the Rules, including recorded reasons and a reasonable opportunity of hearing. As no such opportunity was afforded and no cancellation proceeding had been initiated, the suspension was held invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:21:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 110 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46477</link>
      <description>Domestic tariff area sales under a 100% export oriented unit scheme were treated as part of the composite licence under the Export and Import Policy and the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, not as a separable privilege. Because that facet formed part of the statutory licence, suspension could be made only in compliance with the prescribed procedure under Section 9(4) and the Rules, including recorded reasons and a reasonable opportunity of hearing. As no such opportunity was afforded and no cancellation proceeding had been initiated, the suspension was held invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>