<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 678 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778189</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal, holding that refurbishment of purchased cars by the dealer constitutes self-service and not a taxable intermediary service. The Tribunal followed the earlier HC view that sale of motor vehicles is governed by the Sale of Goods Act and dealers&#039; transactions are sales, not taxable services. Consequently no service tax is payable on the refurbishment component; the impugned order charging service tax was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 678 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778189</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai allowed the appeal, holding that refurbishment of purchased cars by the dealer constitutes self-service and not a taxable intermediary service. The Tribunal followed the earlier HC view that sale of motor vehicles is governed by the Sale of Goods Act and dealers&#039; transactions are sales, not taxable services. Consequently no service tax is payable on the refurbishment component; the impugned order charging service tax was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>