<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 679 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778190</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that a writ court under Article 226 is confined to examining the decision-making process and ordinarily will not interfere with findings of fact made by the authority. The court found no ground for interference but granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue a statutory appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 20.11.2017 before the appellate authority, which must consider and dispose of the appeal strictly in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 679 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778190</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition, holding that a writ court under Article 226 is confined to examining the decision-making process and ordinarily will not interfere with findings of fact made by the authority. The court found no ground for interference but granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue a statutory appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 20.11.2017 before the appellate authority, which must consider and dispose of the appeal strictly in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>