<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 685 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778196</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeal, upholding the NCLAT/NCLT approach that an SFIO investigation report under s.212(12) of the Companies Act, 2013 may be treated akin to a report under s.173 CrPC and is admissible in proceedings under s.212(14A). The Court accepted that the NCLT did not err in considering the SFIO report, the second SFIO report and the compilation of documents, noting the respondent had not pleaded sufficiently to challenge admissibility or reliance on those materials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 685 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778196</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeal, upholding the NCLAT/NCLT approach that an SFIO investigation report under s.212(12) of the Companies Act, 2013 may be treated akin to a report under s.173 CrPC and is admissible in proceedings under s.212(14A). The Court accepted that the NCLT did not err in considering the SFIO report, the second SFIO report and the compilation of documents, noting the respondent had not pleaded sufficiently to challenge admissibility or reliance on those materials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>