https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778202 Judicial consistency and discipline justified refusing to entertain a further Special Leave Petition where the relied upon judgment had already been challenged before the Supreme Court in a Special Leave Petition and a Review Petition, both dismissed; the challenge was accordingly not entertained. The Court also permitted the petitioner to pursue the writ remedy before the Bombay High Court under Article 226, directing that any such petition be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. en-us Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778202 Judicial consistency and discipline justified refusing to entertain a further Special Leave Petition where the relied upon judgment had already been challenged before the Supreme Court in a Special Leave Petition and a Review Petition, both dismissed; the challenge was accordingly not entertained. The Court also permitted the petitioner to pursue the writ remedy before the Bombay High Court under Article 226, directing that any such petition be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778202