<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 715 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778226</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) largely ruled for the assessee on multiple heads: Explanation 2 to s.43B does not apply to clauses (b)-(d); contributions to local organisations, rural development, advertisement-film costs, software expenditure, ESOPs as remuneration, HO expense allocations, administrative retirement-fund expenses, depreciation on block assets, and transfer-related expenditures were allowed as revenue deductions. Sales-tax and TUF interest subsidies were held to be capital receipts (not taxable). Slump-sale treatment/s.50B did not apply to the Scheme of Arrangement; capital receipt treatment upheld and s.50B addition deleted. Dividend from foreign company was decided against the assessee. Disallowances under s.43B for amounts paid/written back were allowed; set-off of interest paid/received with the department was accepted. Deduction u/s 80-IA allowed for rail and specified units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 715 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778226</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI (AT) largely ruled for the assessee on multiple heads: Explanation 2 to s.43B does not apply to clauses (b)-(d); contributions to local organisations, rural development, advertisement-film costs, software expenditure, ESOPs as remuneration, HO expense allocations, administrative retirement-fund expenses, depreciation on block assets, and transfer-related expenditures were allowed as revenue deductions. Sales-tax and TUF interest subsidies were held to be capital receipts (not taxable). Slump-sale treatment/s.50B did not apply to the Scheme of Arrangement; capital receipt treatment upheld and s.50B addition deleted. Dividend from foreign company was decided against the assessee. Disallowances under s.43B for amounts paid/written back were allowed; set-off of interest paid/received with the department was accepted. Deduction u/s 80-IA allowed for rail and specified units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>