<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 717 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778228</link>
    <description>Compensation received for compulsory acquisition of land was claimed as exempt under section 96 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, with corresponding TDS credit sought through rectification of the intimation under section 143(1). The claim was not accepted because the assessee did not produce the return of income, Form 26AS, or acquisition documents despite repeated ities before the appellate authorities, so the exemption and credit could not be verified on record. In these circumstances, the refusal to rectify was not disturbed and the order under section 154 was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:45:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 717 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778228</link>
      <description>Compensation received for compulsory acquisition of land was claimed as exempt under section 96 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, with corresponding TDS credit sought through rectification of the intimation under section 143(1). The claim was not accepted because the assessee did not produce the return of income, Form 26AS, or acquisition documents despite repeated ities before the appellate authorities, so the exemption and credit could not be verified on record. In these circumstances, the refusal to rectify was not disturbed and the order under section 154 was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>