<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 118 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46471</link>
    <description>The court quashed both the communication dated 24-2-2000 and the impugned order dated 30-8-2000, directing the respondents to issue a fresh show-cause notice to the petitioners and pass a final order only after providing a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice and ensuring individuals have the right to defend themselves before adverse actions are taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 118 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46471</link>
      <description>The court quashed both the communication dated 24-2-2000 and the impugned order dated 30-8-2000, directing the respondents to issue a fresh show-cause notice to the petitioners and pass a final order only after providing a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the principles of natural justice and ensuring individuals have the right to defend themselves before adverse actions are taken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>