https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463691 A pending claim for re-allotment of acquired land does not create a vested right to demand disposal contrary to the statutory regime then in force. The land had already vested in the acquiring body, the earlier correspondence did not result in a binding allotment of the full extent claimed, and the Trust had allotted only part of the land. When the remaining claim was still unresolved, the Nagpur Improvement Trust Land Disposal Rules, 1983 applied, and disposal could proceed only in the modes permitted by Rule 5. The respondent's claim for the balance land fell outside those authorised modes, so the decree directing execution of a lease deed could not stand. en-us Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Sep 2025 17:27:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463691 A pending claim for re-allotment of acquired land does not create a vested right to demand disposal contrary to the statutory regime then in force. The land had already vested in the acquiring body, the earlier correspondence did not result in a binding allotment of the full extent claimed, and the Trust had allotted only part of the land. When the remaining claim was still unresolved, the Nagpur Improvement Trust Land Disposal Rules, 1983 applied, and disposal could proceed only in the modes permitted by Rule 5. The respondent's claim for the balance land fell outside those authorised modes, so the decree directing execution of a lease deed could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463691