<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1686 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463692</link>
    <description>Clear Float Glass imported from Malaysia was held classifiable under tariff item 70051090 because heading 7005, read with Chapter Note 2(c) to Chapter 70, covers non-wired glass with a microscopically thin absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting layer, and the tin layer on the glass satisfied that description. On that classification, the benefit of Sl. No. 934 of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus was available, subject to the origin documentation relied on for the imports. The extended period of limitation was not invocable because the record showed a bona fide classification dispute and no positive suppression or wilful misstatement, so confiscation, redemption fine and penalties could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 17:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1686 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463692</link>
      <description>Clear Float Glass imported from Malaysia was held classifiable under tariff item 70051090 because heading 7005, read with Chapter Note 2(c) to Chapter 70, covers non-wired glass with a microscopically thin absorbent, reflecting or non-reflecting layer, and the tin layer on the glass satisfied that description. On that classification, the benefit of Sl. No. 934 of Notification No. 46/2011-Cus was available, subject to the origin documentation relied on for the imports. The extended period of limitation was not invocable because the record showed a bona fide classification dispute and no positive suppression or wilful misstatement, so confiscation, redemption fine and penalties could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>