<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1597 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463670</link>
    <description>Service of a Section 21 arbitration notice was treated as sufficient where the respondent received a copy, replied, and raised no timely objection, so the reference to arbitration was validly invoked. In a running and non-mutual account, payments had to be appropriated under Sections 59, 60 and 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the tribunal erred by confining the claim to later agreements while ignoring ledger evidence and admissions of liability. An award that disregards substantive law and material admissions may suffer patent illegality under Section 34, and the defective part alone can be severed and set aside where the rest of the award is separable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 14:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1597 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463670</link>
      <description>Service of a Section 21 arbitration notice was treated as sufficient where the respondent received a copy, replied, and raised no timely objection, so the reference to arbitration was validly invoked. In a running and non-mutual account, payments had to be appropriated under Sections 59, 60 and 61 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and the tribunal erred by confining the claim to later agreements while ignoring ledger evidence and admissions of liability. An award that disregards substantive law and material admissions may suffer patent illegality under Section 34, and the defective part alone can be severed and set aside where the rest of the award is separable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>