<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (10) TMI 1711 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463672</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging an arbitral award on grounds of alleged conflict with public policy, lack of jurisdiction where the debtor admitted liability but delayed payment, and inherent inconsistency. HC had earlier found no merit in the appellant&#039;s claim that awarding interest at 8% p.a. offended public policy. SC, not inclined to interfere under Article 136, affirmed the HC view and refused to entertain the petition; SLP dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 18:57:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (10) TMI 1711 - Supreme Court (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463672</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging an arbitral award on grounds of alleged conflict with public policy, lack of jurisdiction where the debtor admitted liability but delayed payment, and inherent inconsistency. HC had earlier found no merit in the appellant&#039;s claim that awarding interest at 8% p.a. offended public policy. SC, not inclined to interfere under Article 136, affirmed the HC view and refused to entertain the petition; SLP dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>