https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463673 Suppression of material facts in seeking discretionary writ relief disentitled the litigant to relief, because consequential orders passed after the earlier writ judgment were not disclosed and were directly relevant to the dispute. The Court also treated the earlier tenancy and revenue proceedings as final, holding that a later attempt could not reopen the same controversy on a changed or manipulated factual basis, including altered party identity and subject matter. On these grounds, the High Court orders were unsustainable and were set aside, with restoration of the writ court's orders. en-us Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Sep 2025 11:18:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463673 Suppression of material facts in seeking discretionary writ relief disentitled the litigant to relief, because consequential orders passed after the earlier writ judgment were not disclosed and were directly relevant to the dispute. The Court also treated the earlier tenancy and revenue proceedings as final, holding that a later attempt could not reopen the same controversy on a changed or manipulated factual basis, including altered party identity and subject matter. On these grounds, the High Court orders were unsustainable and were set aside, with restoration of the writ court's orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463673