https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463674 NCLAT (Principal Bench) rejected the appeal as barred by limitation under Section 421, Companies Act, 2013, holding that the SC decision relied on was fact-specific and did not address maintainability of time-barred appeals. The tribunal found no basis to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent for late filing of a reply, allowed time for rejoinder, and noted the delay-condonation application and reply were already heard and disposed by the tribunal's judgment dated 21.10.2024; no relief granted and the application was dismissed. en-us Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Sep 2025 18:57:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463674 NCLAT (Principal Bench) rejected the appeal as barred by limitation under Section 421, Companies Act, 2013, holding that the SC decision relied on was fact-specific and did not address maintainability of time-barred appeals. The tribunal found no basis to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondent for late filing of a reply, allowed time for rejoinder, and noted the delay-condonation application and reply were already heard and disposed by the tribunal's judgment dated 21.10.2024; no relief granted and the application was dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463674