<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 2077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463681</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that the transfer pricing adjustment disallowing Advertisement, Marketing and Promotional (AMP) expenses as an international transaction was erroneous. Relying on precedent from the Tribunal, the bench concluded AMP expenditures incurred by the appellant do not constitute an international transaction under s. 92B of the I.T. Act. The appeal was allowed and the addition was deleted, decision in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 16:40:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 2077 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463681</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI - AT held that the transfer pricing adjustment disallowing Advertisement, Marketing and Promotional (AMP) expenses as an international transaction was erroneous. Relying on precedent from the Tribunal, the bench concluded AMP expenditures incurred by the appellant do not constitute an international transaction under s. 92B of the I.T. Act. The appeal was allowed and the addition was deleted, decision in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>