<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1608 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463685</link>
    <description>ITAT upholds the assessments: approval under s153D was valid and the assessee&#039;s additional ground is dismissed. Unexplained cash expenditure under s69C-claimed to have been incurred by a third-party HUF-remained unexplained as the assessee failed to produce that person or source; limitation has lapsed for action against the third party, so the claim to shift the burden was rejected. The additions on merits for all three assessment years are confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 15:36:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1608 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463685</link>
      <description>ITAT upholds the assessments: approval under s153D was valid and the assessee&#039;s additional ground is dismissed. Unexplained cash expenditure under s69C-claimed to have been incurred by a third-party HUF-remained unexplained as the assessee failed to produce that person or source; limitation has lapsed for action against the third party, so the claim to shift the burden was rejected. The additions on merits for all three assessment years are confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>