https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46459 The dispute concerned the excisability of semi-finished floor coverings cleared under Rule 56B of the Central Excise Rules. The Supreme Court considered that a subsequent Tribunal decision and the evidence already on record required further examination, so the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law. No final determination was made on the substantive excisability controversy. en-us Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:59:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46459 The dispute concerned the excisability of semi-finished floor coverings cleared under Rule 56B of the Central Excise Rules. The Supreme Court considered that a subsequent Tribunal decision and the evidence already on record required further examination, so the matter was remitted to the Tribunal for fresh decision in accordance with law. No final determination was made on the substantive excisability controversy. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46459